![]() Yes, for most of my projects, 24 Mp will be more than enough and yes most of my customers won’t see any difference with the pictures no matter what camera I use. It was realizing that the attitude of „ I do not need this, it does not matter which camera I use, any will do“, has a psychological problem. What tipped me off was not a technical feature, like the good viewfinder, better AF or more megapixel. Seems like here in Austria not so many photographers want to spend 4000.-€, because the shops here don’t get larger quantities like in the USA. And when I phoned them three days later the camera was still available, so I bought it. To my astonishment, one of the photoshops had the D850 on display. I failed because a week ago I strolled through a town here in Lower Austria. I even tried to argue me off this purchase. tax here in Europe) as you have to buy an XQD card and a card reader up front with this camera. It is an investment of at least 4000.-€ (incl. So why upgrade at all? I already skipped the D810, although I occasionally got mild G.A.S. With a zoom lens like the 24-120 it is less or not visible at all, with a “better” lens there might be a bigger difference (I do not own an Otus lens). There is a small difference in resolution and dynamic range. Left D850 with Iso 64 and electronic first curtain, right Nikon D800 with Iso 100. Even the files of the D750 are perfect most of the time.īoth pictures are made with the Nikon 50 mm f1,8 with a tripod and with mirror up. On the other hand, also nothing to get too excited, as the files of my beaten D800 are more than good enough still for 99% of my work. ![]() ![]() To make it short, the file quality is very good, nothing to complain about. I had the chance to play with the new Nikon D850 very early (August 30th, 2017) and could also work with RAW files thanks to Raw Therapee. Nikon D850 and the new guitar problem by Christian Handl
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |